Effective Use of Social Media by Genesis

Effective Use of Social Media by GenesisWe love to showcase examples of social media best practices – we especially love to showcase them when they’re our clients!

As I’m sure you recall, a couple months ago new recommendations for breast cancer screenings were announced, causing quite the stir in the medical community and confusing a lot of women on how to proceed with their healthcare.

Geonetric client Genesis Health System understood the urgency of the situation and was able to bring their expertise and specialists to the table immediately.  And they were able to do so in part because they had already put an impressive social media foundation in place.

Using both their Facebook and Twitter accounts, Genesis promoted their own expert’s recommendations. And since Genesis already had a good following on both social media platforms, they were able to receive immediate feedback from the community.

But it didn’t stop there – Genesis also used their Facebook and Twitter accounts to promote that one of their experts would be discussing the controversy on their Saturday talk radio program and also connected physicians with the local TV news to answer questions.

Genesis did an amazing job of understanding the urgency of the topic and saw the implications for patient care.  They immediately stepped up and used both their traditional and social media outlets to reinforce their position as a credible health expert in their community.

PS: If you’re looking for a great example of healthcare social media usage, be sure to sign up to follow Genesis on Facebook and Twitter.

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Ping.fm
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Reddit
  • LinkedIn
  • FriendFeed
  • Add to favorites
  • PDF
  • Netvibes
  • RSS
  • email
  • Print

Southwest v. Kevin Smith – The Danger of Customer Segmentation

Southwest v. Kevin Smith - The Danger of Customer SegmentationIt’s one of those early lessons in business – understand who your customer is, segment your audiences, don’t sell to the ones you can’t service profitably, and try to capture as much of the available value as you can from each group.  Businesses that do this well can thrive.  Those who fail to pay heed to this rule tend not to last very long.

It sounds crass, but it’s a reality of business.  This is what Apple does when it charges more for a newly released iPhone.  Apple knows there are devotees who will pay to be the first ones to have the latest new Apple gadget.  And once they’ve bought it, Apple drops the price to open its appeal to a larger audience.

No one faults Apple for this.  But making this work isn’t always easy.

In 2004, Best Buy decided it had a group of customers it was losing money on and, therefore, didn’t want.  These bad customers would buy several similar products, try them out, and then return some or all of them. Best Buy was then stuck selling the returned products at a discount.  The worst offenders would return all of the products and then purchase the one they liked from a cheaper online retailer or re-buy the returned product from Best Buy at an open-box discount.

Best Buy’s solution was restocking fees.  It was a clear way to deter this group of customers who were gaming the system.  Unfortunately, it also makes the buying experience at Best Buy less attractive for all of their other customers.

This is where segmentation gets tricky.  There is often a tradeoff between your ability to treat different customers differently and the experience they are left with.

Enter Southwest Airlines and their “Customers of Size” policy.

If you’re not familiar with this particular quirk of America’s most popular airline, here’s how it works: if you are a large person – large enough to be unable to lower both armrests – then you must purchase two seats.  If this is an issue for you, you are encouraged to purchase two seats proactively, as many flights are fully booked and you may not be allowed to stay on the plane if another seat isn’t available for you.

Southwest, like most other airlines, crams us all in like sardines.  Southwest is betting that the majority of passengers will have a better experience if they don’t get crammed in next to someone too large for their seat.

Needless to say, it has been a controversial policy and the airline has received its share of criticism.  The policy has caused a lot of drama this week when actor and director Kevin Smith used Twitter to take his anger to his 1.7 million Twitter followers.

So this is the danger in segmenting.  Does the benefits that Southwest gains from the goodwill of customers that aren’t at risk from the policy, plus some additional revenues from those buying two seats counter the negative PR from a not so Silent Bob?

Southwest seems to think so.  They’re standing by their policy and I dare say that they appear to be enjoying the attention.  Perhaps, in the end, this helps them publicize a segmentation strategy that they’d never be able to market explicitly.  We’ll just have to wait and see if Southwest starts bumping public figures more often in the future.

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Ping.fm
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Reddit
  • LinkedIn
  • FriendFeed
  • Add to favorites
  • PDF
  • Netvibes
  • RSS
  • email
  • Print

Google Gets a Little Buzzed

Google Gets a Little BuzzedSearch players have been dancing around the margins of social media for the past several months.  Google and Bing have been integrating social media – such as blogs, Twitter and ratings from sites like Yelp – into search results.  Anyone who’s playing in the space has realized this is a mere dipping of their toes into the water.

This week, Google made a considerably bigger splash.

The social networks as they exist today represent a significant departure from the way the Web worked in its early years.  We’ve moved from a time where a relatively limited number of people published information online to one in which anyone can put information out there and real-time, consumer-generated information is the next great frontier of the Web.

Of course when I say “relatively limited,” I still mean there were millions of users and sites.  Search engines emerged as the de facto approach to finding what you needed.

Now, the problem of finding the relevant information that exists online is much, much more challenging.  Social networks began as a way to focus on people with whom you have a connection or common interest.  If you have a group of dozens or even a few hundred people, you can follow what they share relatively easily.  Personally, I’ve flown far past that point.  I follow nearly 2,000 people on Twitter, a few hundred on Facebook and a few hundred on LinkedIn.  And I’ve rejected requests to a slew of other networks.

Google took the first step yesterday to tame this for me in the way that Google does.  They’ve become an intelligent aggregator of all of this content with their new service, Buzz.

Buzz builds off of existing Google platforms, most notably the Gmail email platform and Google maps, and pulls content seamlessly from other Google properties, such as Picasa, as well as unaffiliated services like Twitter and to some extent Facebook.

You can look at Buzz in a variety of ways. 

  • Buzz begins to focus search around your personal network.
  • Buzz could be yet another set in the commoditization of the underlying messaging networks – what is Twitter, for instance, if no one ever goes to the Twitter.com site in the future?
  • Buzz is a solution to social network fatigue – while not the first player to pull information from various social networks into a single view (applications like Tweetdeck and Hootsuite have done this for some time) there is an attempt to organize the information to create an experience that is unique to Buzz.
  • Buzz is another attempt to get traction in location-aware applications – the first mention of Buzz that I saw was in an update to Google Maps on my Droid.  Google’s Latitude service, while interesting, has failed to gain the wide adoption seen by solutions like Four Square.  Perhaps Buzz becomes the killer app for location awareness that Google has been looking for.

In all likelihood, Buzz is a beginning.  The beginning of Google getting serious about the social Web with much more yet to come.

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Ping.fm
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Reddit
  • LinkedIn
  • FriendFeed
  • Add to favorites
  • PDF
  • Netvibes
  • RSS
  • email
  • Print

Geonetric Client Recognized for Physician Marketing Success

Finding new and effective ways to include physicians in hospital marketing isn’t always easy. But Geonetric’s client Southern Regional Health System (SRHS) has had nothing but success with its latest campaign.

In fact – they’ve had so much success they’ve landed themselves on the cover of the latest issue of the Atlanta Hospital News.

In the article Marcus Gordon, strategic marketing manager at SRHS talks about the campaign, which included weekly TV spots that highlight different physicians talking about specific medical conditions often faced by patients. The campaign also included community seminars, informational DVDs, and social media aspects such as YouTube, Twitter, and Facebook.  Here’s an example of one of their Healthbreak videos.

SRHS did a great job of tracking and saw increases in calls, referrals, Web site traffic and views to YouTube.

To learn more about this campaign check out the online article. It’s a great case study.

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Ping.fm
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Reddit
  • LinkedIn
  • FriendFeed
  • Add to favorites
  • PDF
  • Netvibes
  • RSS
  • email
  • Print

Meaningful Concerns?

Meaningful Concerns?While much of the response to the ARRA meaningful use rules has been optimistic, there is a growing list of individuals and organizations expressing concerns about the legislation including, it appears, Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa.

I’ve personally written off the complaints that achieving these goals are going to be hard. If it were easy, we wouldn’t be making this much fuss about them. But there are some very valid concerns about the legislation, many of which are summarized in Anthony Guerra’s article this week in InformationWeek Healthcare. Guerra cites the exclusion of many hospital-based providers from the program as well as the long time taken in establishing the rules (during which time many providers have held off purchases) followed by the relatively short timeframe for implementing the required systems.

The critiques that concern me more, however, are those that question the value of electronic medical records technologies. When those concerns come from Sen. Grassley (R-Iowa), it makes me wonder if the healthcare IT stimulus dollars may face significant hurdles before finding their way to providers.

Grassley’s concerns took the form of a letter in January seeking information from 31 hospitals about their contracts with their IT vendors and asking questions about “gag orders,” vendor kickbacks and health IT-related errors. This effort follows a letter Sen. Grassley sent last fall to 10 health IT firms asking for them to provide copies of complaints they’ve received about their systems.

The timing of the letters comes amidst pushback close to home. Only two days prior to the Senator’s most recent letters, the Iowa City Press-Citizen highlighted the continuing issues with University of Iowa Healthcare’s Epic implementation. You have to imagine that issues in his state’s largest hospital have generated more than a few of the complaints reaching Sen. Grassley’s ears.

Do Sen. Grassley’s investigations put meaningful use incentive dollars at risk?

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Ping.fm
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Reddit
  • LinkedIn
  • FriendFeed
  • Add to favorites
  • PDF
  • Netvibes
  • RSS
  • email
  • Print

Step by Step Patient Portals

Step by Step Patient PortalsYou’ve seen the difficulties in reforming healthcare at a national level. Even changing significant parts of healthcare delivery in a single organization is complex and fraught with technical and political challenges.

One area we’ve seen this is in the adoption of patient portals. Some healthcare organizations have adopted EMR-centric patient portals, which for a purebred organization can work great. But for most hospitals and IDNs, the situation is far murkier because:

  • The EMR vendor doesn’t have a patient portal (or they do, but it doesn’t fit your business need)
  • You have a best of breed approach and mix and match numerous systems, making data integration complex and costly
  • Existing patient portal products are difficult to use
  • The cost is too high

Our approach to patient portals is a bit different, and addresses all of these challenges. But one area in particular that we focus on is the ability to implement a patient portal in phases.

Depending on the organization, the political or technical situation may dictate a step-by-step approach, biting off just the highest priority components first. Sometimes this means taking the existing Web site and appending a Patient Portal, “unplugged,” which provides consumers and patients with most of the benefits of a fully integrated portal but without the complexities in tying all of the loose ends together. Sometimes this means building a narrow pilot with a specific service line or a single facility to build internal support and the business case for moving forward on a larger project. Then, when you’re ready, you can move forward with the fully integrated, enterprise-wide adoption.

The point is that the larger the project, the higher the risk, and the higher the cost. Taking it one step at a time gives you several benefits:

  • You can reap results faster
  • The overall project risk is lower
  • You can get feedback along the way, making improvements at each step

In short, you can have your cake and eat it too.

This month’s Webinar, in fact, deals with this exact situation. Genesis Health System worked with us to deploy their patient portal in just this fashion. Ben Dillon will be introducing Ken Croken, Vice President of Marketing at Genesis Health System, and they’ll provide some perspective on how to introduce the elements of a patient portal. Register to attend it on February 25.

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Ping.fm
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Reddit
  • LinkedIn
  • FriendFeed
  • Add to favorites
  • PDF
  • Netvibes
  • RSS
  • email
  • Print

It’s All About the Experience

It’s About the ExperienceEvery restaurateur knows it’s not just about the food. It’s about how quickly the guests are seated. How friendly the server acts. How clean the silverware is.

Customer service 101, right? But how quickly we forget the basics…

I’ve been talking about the importance of the patient/consumer experience in healthcare for a long time.  Usually, I focus on what happens outside of the hospital or clinic and, more specifically, the role and opportunities the Web provides to create positive experiences.  But the fact is a health consumers’ experience with your organization starts long before they walk in the door and continues long after they leave.

Each touch point during this time—appointment reminders, the scheduling process and even the bill they receive— leaves just as much of an impression as the interaction they have with their physician.  And many of these health consumers (and this number will only rise as Internet-savvy consumers continue to age) would like to interact with you online, and the ability to do so makes or breaks the experience for them.

Word of mouth –made even more powerful

I’m still amazed at how many people and organizations within healthcare have not yet embraced the importance of the consumer experience.  For example, Susan Guirleo, PhD, blogged recently about why she fired her primary care physician.  She loved her doctor, but resented her experiences with the staff.

Such examples of people talking about their healthcare experiences in such a public arena are becoming increasingly common, and often without the tact and anonymity of the offending parties that Dr. Guirleo provides.

With the emergence and popularity of Web 2.0, the reach of any single disgruntled patient is vastly expanded today over what it once was.  More importantly, the overall perception of a doctor, clinic or hospital is about to become far more important than it has been in the past.

Patient ratings at their fingertips

You’re probably familiar with HCACPS – a standardized survey and methodology for measuring patients’ perspectives on hospital care. Bing recently began presenting these ratings directly in some search results.

Bing recently began presenting these ratings directly in some search results.

Think about the implications.

When the most aggressive up-and-coming search engine looked at the one piece of information they could provide to help health consumers make decisions, they chose the rating patients gave to the facility.  It wasn’t quality of care, cost information or their impressive doctors and treatment options.

It was the overall experience.

Quality care is assumed. What else will you provide?

Experience was the focus of a recent conversation I had with industry-veteran Ken Croken, Vice President of Corporate Communications and Marketing at Genesis Health System.  Genesis is a forward-thinking organization and they know about this topic, having just won the coveted J.D. Powers award in 2009 for their Outstanding Inpatient Experience. (Ken will be joining us for our February Webinar to discuss about how the bar has been raised for consumer experiences, particularly online.)

When talking about the importance of the consumer experience, Ken explains that quality care is assumed by patients.  It’s how patients are treated through their visit that drives how they feel about it after the fact.

The experience is the culmination of a lot of little things.  The impact of someone in housekeeping who asks a patient or family member if there is anything else they need after cleaning a room carries considerable power, as does a smile from a receptionist who gives the patient their full attention or a polite scheduler with good telephone skills.

This seems fundamental, right? But so many organizations are still missing the boat. For hospitals that haven’t seen the light, creating great experiences will involve a significant cultural change to institutionalize a customer service mentality in the organization.

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Ping.fm
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Reddit
  • LinkedIn
  • FriendFeed
  • Add to favorites
  • PDF
  • Netvibes
  • RSS
  • email
  • Print

Event Management Made Simpler

As Eric mentioned recently, “We got a LOT done last year!

With more than twenty new or enhanced features, the Q1 release of VitalSite focused on adding power and flexibility to VitalSite Calendar and Event Registration module.

We’ve discovered that each organization and department we work with has unique ways of handling registrations and payments. There is no “one right way” to manage events, even within a single organization. Events ranging from health education classes and screenings to continuing education, professional development, and fundraising events all have unique needs.

This release adds features to make it even easier to promote all of these events and manage registrations through a single tool which is tightly integrated into your Web site. It doesn’t matter whether those registrations come in from the Web, mail, phone, or in-person and are paid by credit card, electronic check, paper check, or cash at the door—we can manage it all in VitalSite.

A screenshot doesn’t really tell the full story, so we put together a short video to give you a rapid walkthrough of the features in the VitalSite Q1 release.

As you watch, keep in mind that we’re already passing the halfway point of development on our next release. It has some really cool features that I can’t wait to show off in a few short weeks!

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Ping.fm
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Reddit
  • LinkedIn
  • FriendFeed
  • Add to favorites
  • PDF
  • Netvibes
  • RSS
  • email
  • Print

Getting Real About Redesign

Getting Real About RedesignI talk a lot.  In fact, talking about how healthcare organizations can make the most of online technologies is what I do for a living.  I can (and do) talk all day about models and strategy and processes. 

While people love to hear me talk (you all do, don’t you?), I understand my own limitations.  I can talk conceptual models all day – but what I miss are the real stories of working with administration, for example, how to get people in your organization to take on the management of classes on your site or to review content before a go-live.

If you want to hear from people in healthcare organizations like yours sharing war stories and battle scars earned in recent site redesigns, you’ve come to the right place. Our 2010 Webinar series launches with these stories.

Joining me today during our Webinar, “Keeping it Fresh: A Redesign Roundtable,” are Philip Stanley, Webmaster at Asante Health System in Oregon; Joshua Snow, Web Center Manager for Abington Health in Pennsylvania; and Marcus Gordon, Strategic Marketing Manager at Southern Regional Health System in Georgia.

It’s not too late to register for the Webinar!

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Ping.fm
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Reddit
  • LinkedIn
  • FriendFeed
  • Add to favorites
  • PDF
  • Netvibes
  • RSS
  • email
  • Print

Real-Time Search

Real-Time Search…is the most important reason to get your hospital on Twitter.

Once upon a time, Google’s algorithm gave extra weight to pages that had been on the Web for a long time.  The thought was that this information was authoritative, and it helped protect against people trying to manipulate results in the short term.

This approach works well for certain types of searches.  For example, if you are looking for information about historical events.  But use of the Internet is increasingly moving from being the world’s largest reference library to an infinitely large 24×7 breaking news service.

Google expresses the problem as one of content freshness – some content needs to be prioritized based on its newness rather than its longevity.  For example, there are times when a search for “earthquake” should prioritize what causes earthquakes or historical earthquakes while other times, breaking news about an earthquake that has just occurred should top the list.

While some of the fresh content comes from new postings from news outlets, an increasing amount of this information finds it way online through user-generated content in the form of blogs, Twitter and other social media channels.

The immediacy of Twitter ­— along with the size of its user-base — places it in the lead in terms of the real-time Web.  The real value of this constant flow of information is not extending beyond individuals’ personal networks as this data gets mined for greater insights.

Enter a new crop of search engines built around real-time search, including Topsy, Collecta, OneRiot and Scoopler.  While most of these tools are searching through social media content, these new search engines amount to more than just that.   They use Twitter and other social media as a sort of ad hoc voting system to get a sense of what’s important or interesting right now.  If 100 people reTweet a link to a blog post about “Meaningful Use” then it’s a safe bet that it’s a good article and worth prioritizing in a search for that topic.

In the future, part of being found online is going to fall to your ability to get some social media buzz about your discussion of key topics.  This doesn’t just mean new, breaking topics like H1N1, but may also come into play for searches for key service line topics in the future.

Just one more good reason to start working social media into the mix!

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Ping.fm
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Reddit
  • LinkedIn
  • FriendFeed
  • Add to favorites
  • PDF
  • Netvibes
  • RSS
  • email
  • Print